Category: Default

Todoist is a task manager that has been shipping since 2007, when Doist founder Amir Salihefendic first released it; Wikipedia’s entry on the app puts registered users past 30 million as of 2024. Its shape is familiar by now: projects, lists, due dates, and a quick-add box that turns typed sentences into scheduled tasks. Doist, a remote company, has kept the app deliberately narrow through every redesign. This review covers what the app does well, what each plan costs as of mid-2026, and where the plan limits push users toward paying.

The basics

Todoist organizes work into projects, sections, sub-tasks, labels, and four priority levels. Dates are its strongest feature. Typing “pay rent every first friday at 9am” into the quick-add field produces a properly recurring task with no date picker involved, and that parser is the main reason the app feels fast in daily use.

Two layouts ship on every plan: a list and a board. A calendar layout, task durations, and deadlines sit behind the Pro plan. There are apps for iOS, Android, macOS, and Windows, plus a web app and browser extensions, and sync between them is quick enough that phone-to-desktop handoffs don’t cause duplicate entries. A Karma score tracks streaks and daily completion trends, which some users like and others ignore completely. Collaboration runs through shared projects: anyone on the free plan can share a project, assign tasks, and comment inside it.

What it costs

Three plans, checked against Todoist’s pricing page in mid-2026. Beginner is free and covers up to 5 active personal projects and 3 custom filter views, with activity history kept 7 days and file uploads capped at 5 MB. Tasks with a date and time get automatic reminders on any plan. Custom, location-based, and recurring reminders are Pro-only.

Pro runs $7/month, or $60/year which works out to $5/month. That tier lifts the caps to 300 projects and 150 filter views and adds the calendar layout, task durations, deadlines, full activity history, daily backups, and Todoist’s AI helpers (Assist, Email Assist, unlimited Ramble capture sessions). The trial is 7 days. Business is $10/user/month, or $8/user/month billed yearly at $96/user/year plus local tax, and it adds the shared team workspace: up to 500 team projects, roles and permissions, restricted projects, team folders, and centralized billing. Its trial runs 14 days. Two billing quirks worth knowing. A Pro subscription belongs to a single account, so Todoist supports neither Apple Family Sharing nor Google Play Family Library. And the sticker has already moved once: in December 2025 Pro went from $5 to $7/month and Business from $8 to $10/month.

Where it works

For one person juggling errands and job tasks, the free tier covers a small life without complaint. Five lists fit home, work, bills, shopping, and a hobby. Recurring dates are free and reliable, which makes Todoist decent for maintenance routines: monthly backups, quarterly invoices, weekly reviews. Shared projects work well for two or three people splitting chores or a small backlog, and the free plan allows that.

The $60/year Pro tier is the plan this review keeps landing on. Reminders and deadlines close the gap where an undated task sits unnoticed until its day has passed, and the calendar layout turns Todoist into a light planning tool without pulling in a second app. For teams, Business earns its $8 seat with roles, restricted projects, and one bill instead of a pile of individual subscriptions.

Where it comes up short

The five-project cap bites households first, since six lists means paying or merging lists until they stop making sense. Karma points reward streaks and add nothing to planning. Todoist stays list-first: there’s no timeline or Gantt view as of mid-2026, and task durations only draw blocks on the Pro calendar. Nothing records hours actually spent, so real time tracking needs a third-party integration. The per-account Pro price means a couple sharing one household setup both pay $60/year for reminders and deadlines. Monthly plans aren’t refundable at all, so the sensible order is a free month, the 7-day Pro trial, then the yearly rate once the app has clearly stuck.

Anyone with fewer than six lists should stay on free and lose little besides custom reminders. Past that point, Pro at $60/year is a fair trade for deadlines and the calendar view. Teams past three or four people will want Business for roles and centralized billing, and should spend the 14-day trial checking the shared workspace first. The app’s value is fast capture plus limits you can see in advance, which is more than most task managers in this price range deliver.

When an app dies in a tester’s hand or on a customer’s phone, the report that lands in the dashboard is raw material. Turning it into a diagnosis takes work, and crash reporting tools differ sharply in how much of that work they absorb. Three features decide the outcome: symbolication, grouping, and breadcrumbs. This review looks at what each one does, how Sentry, Bugsnag, and Firebase Crashlytics behave in practice, and what the tools cost as of mid-2026.

Symbolication runs first

Release builds strip human-readable names out of binaries. A trace from a shipped build arrives as memory addresses (0x1f4a8c and friends) with no hint of which function failed. Symbolication maps those addresses back to source-level names using debug files: dSYM bundles on iOS, ProGuard or R8 mapping files on Android, source maps for JavaScript. Wikipedia’s entry on debug symbols covers the general mechanism.

All three tools accept these files and run the mapping on their servers. The upload step is where teams get burned. iOS builds need a dSYM uploaded per build through Xcode’s upload-symbols script or a CI step. Android builds need the mapping.txt that R8 emits, kept per release. Crashlytics ties its uploads to the Firebase CLI and the Gradle plugin, so an upload that silently fails shows up later as an issue full of raw addresses. Sentry and Bugsnag flag unuploaded debug files in their release views. When the debug file is lost, every tool degrades to the same unreadable trace, and none of them can reconstruct the mapping after the fact. This is the single most common reason a crash dashboard looks useless in its first week.

Grouping decides what counts as one bug

A thousand crashes sharing one root cause should appear as one issue. Grouping is the algorithm that makes that call, and tool behavior diverges here. Sentry derives a fingerprint from stack frames, exception type, and a documented set of heuristics, and its event grouping docs lay out exactly which frames count and how to override the result with a custom fingerprint. Bugsnag computes a similar frame-based grouping hash, then pairs it with a stability score: the percentage of crash-free sessions, which becomes the number a team can aim at directly.

Crashlytics clusters issues on its own logic and offers no user-settable fingerprint and no manual merge. When it splits one bug across several clusters, teams either live with the split or track the root cause in a ticket. In practice Sentry gives the most control over grouping, Bugsnag gives the cleanest stability metric, and Crashlytics gives the least configuration but asks the least setup.

Breadcrumbs show the run-up

The stack trace says where an app died. Breadcrumbs record the path there: taps, navigation events, network calls, and log lines written before the crash. Out of the box, all three SDKs log lifecycle and navigation events. The richer detail (HTTP breadcrumbs with request metadata, custom application state) takes a little instrumentation code.

Behavior under load matters. Sentry keeps a ring buffer of breadcrumbs, 100 by default, and discards the oldest entries when it fills. Bugsnag caps its buffer too and drops the oldest first. A crash after a long session therefore shows only the final stretch of activity, which is usually enough since the bug normally lives near the end. Crashlytics takes a different route: custom keys (up to 64 per session) and log calls that attach developer-defined context to every crash in the session. For debugging state-dependent mobile bugs, those keys often beat a generic breadcrumb trail.

What the three tools cost

Pricing checked against public pages in mid-2026. Sentry’s Developer tier is free at 5,000 errors and 10,000 performance transactions per month. Its Team plan runs $26 per month for 50,000 errors and 100,000 transactions, which covers most mid-sized mobile apps comfortably. Bugsnag’s entry paid tier, Lite, is $59 per month for roughly 150,000 events, with no smaller paid plan below it. SmartBear has owned Bugsnag since 2021 and now sells it alongside its testing tools. Firebase Crashlytics charges nothing, on every Firebase plan. The price there shows up in the form of shallower grouping controls and a dependency on Firebase itself.

For a solo developer or a small team, Crashlytics at zero dollars is hard to argue with. Teams that need custom fingerprints, richer event context, or non-mobile platforms usually find the $26 Sentry tier the sweet spot. Bugsnag earns its $59 for teams that manage by stability score and want that number front and center.

How to choose

The practical test is what a team does with a report on Monday morning. If the workflow is “open the dashboard, find the top issue, fix it,” Crashlytics covers it for free. If the workflow involves tuning which crashes group together, digging through pre-crash activity, and attaching reports to releases across iOS, Android, and web, Sentry’s control and price fit better. Bugsnag suits teams that want a single stability target to report upward and are happy paying more for that focus. Pick the tool whose report answers the question your team already asks, then verify it with one deliberate crash in a release build before trusting any dashboard.